Is photography art essay
Just because you don't like it as much as, say, a painting, doesn't automatically make it not an art form. Photography is most definitely art! There is so many things you can do to photography. You can change the tints and colors.
You can paint over photos, and develop them. In art class at school I took a class on just photography and I learned so much from that! Photos on a wall are considered art and I think that it is just totally wrong to say that photography is not art! It doesn't matter if you photograph it or paint it. If it contains emotion, it's art. Art is expression, and photography is fully capable of being a medium of expression.
Art is beauty, and photography is fully capable of being beautiful.
- ap environmental science essay 2001.
- How Photography Became an Art Form.
- Reflections on Photography & Art Essay Series - Developing Your Vision.
- introduction paragraph essay format?
There is no denying the fact that photography is art, regardless of one's definition. As someone who is fond of photography, I definitely believe it to be art! There is something to be said for choosing one's subject matter carefully as well as making sure to get a perfect shot. Anyone can just hold a camera and snap a picture, but you won't get a truly great photograph that way. Or maybe sometimes you will-- but that's part of the fun, human, subjective nature of art! The definition of art is the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.
Photography shows beauty therefore it is art. I rest my argument with how many times do you see a photograph of something and say oh my god that is so pretty or I wish I was there enjoying that beauty. And to those who say it takes no skill to take a photograph YOUR WRONG you have to know what type of lighting you have to have and at what angle you have to be at in order to take a good picture. Yes there are cameras out there that you can just point and shoot but is really going to look right? What's that I saw on your linked in profile under interests?
Ah I see, I think I'll add that one.
Photography as Art
Wait, I need proof. Let me just get my phone out and take black and white pictures of the flowers and vase in my lounge. And I think I'll take one at 45 degrees and change to sepia. I say this not to trivialise the debate, but to provide a narrative as to what photography has become. Of course the motion can't be discussed by questioning what art is. Indeed a difficult question.
Is photography art? | swisovatgau.tk
One which philosophers have pondered over for ages. Would you class my example above as art. Other posters have spouted that arguably every drawing or photograph is art. Is poetry art? If so then what is the form? The writing of the poem? Its oration? I follow art and art history, and you could make similar comparisons.
- Writing about Photography;
- Essay on Fine Art Photography?
- Visual arts - Wikipedia.
- growing up as an only child essay.
Let me take painting as an example to focus the debate. When I paint, it is MY hand which is capturing the photo. It is my hand which is creating the indelible mark and capturing emotion, light perspective, etc. With the camera its a lens, computer or printer. Yes, you can augment it with photoshop and other software. Granted this requires technical input, but the bottom line is that the physical creation was not done by you. This analogy can be thrown out as the presentation of an authors work bears no resemblance on the meaning of the work.
It is still his story which he had thought up.
The creativity that has gone into it is not diminished by typing it. The difference between a painting of someone and a picture of them is profound. In terms of effort, technical execution and creative input TBC. Art is anything you create. It doesn't matter if you made something out of nothing, or something out of something. If you made something out of nothing, congradulations you made art.
If you made something out of something, congratulations, you added on to the art and created more art to it. Art, I believe is enhancing someone else's perspective on things. A simple photograph of a chair in a dark corner might not mean anything to you, but to someone else, they can relate to it. If you add on color, make it black and white, change the tints, you make it more appealing. Example, there is a black and white photo of an apple sitting on a table outside on a fall day. With it being black and white, maybe you can't really tell if it is fall outside, and maybe the apple looks like a pear.
Edit it, leave the grass and sky black and white, and make the apple a deep red, and the leaves golden and brown. You just made it instantly more beautiful and people gain more understanding of what the picture is. Anything is art. If taking a picture is not art because its from a machine, then music is not an art because of the machines they use to enhance the sound. Open your minds. For those who say that art is made only by a person not a device, you're wrong. The person controls the camera, the person clicks the button, they control what they take a picture of.
It is impossible to answer the question posed until agreement is reached as to a definition as to what art is. Unlikely to happen. That is a difficult question to answer and everybody will have their own definition. Everybody who can hold a pencil or brush can create an image. Is every image art? Is it not art just because it is a representation of something that already exists?
How many paintings are of something that does not exist? Arguably every image, whether a drawing painting or photograph is "art". But some images will be more compelling than others. Is all we mean by art that it is something liked by the majority? Even within the world of painting arguments rage as to what is considered art.
This will run and run……. Art serves itself and serves people. So do photography. Art is beautiful.